Knowledge and Attitude about Basic Life Support and Emergency Medical Services amongst Healthcare Interns in University Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Road traffic accident and sudden cardiac arrest are one of the most leading causes of death in KSA. Basic life support (BLS) is lifesaving intervention as a premedical facility. Adequate knowledge and awareness about BLS and CPR are mandatory for healthcare students. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study is to assess the knowledge, awareness and attitude towards BLS among healthcare interns in different university hospitals across Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods. A total of 865 health interns attending the health colleges (Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing, Pharmacy) in the University Hospitals across KSA participated in the study. A self-explanatory questionnaire, comprising of 15 questions, was designed for the study. All the hypotheses were formulated using two-tailed alternatives against each null hypothesis. RESULT: Out of 865 subjects, 698 completed the survey with a response rate of (80.69%). The male to female sex ratio in the entire group of respondents was 1.44:1.00. Mean score about the awareness and knowledge of BLS and other emergency services among the participants was 2.74±1.02 and 4.02±1.56 respectively. Female participants revealed significantly higher awareness score than male (P-value<0.05). Medical interns showed higher awareness level compared to rest of all the faculty interns (P-value<0.01). There was no significant difference in the attitude of interns among the different faculties. 60 to 70% of interns had recommended to include BLS training in the university curriculum. CONCLUSION: Among the participants of the study, overall awareness score was average, whereas the knowledge score was below average. Further, the participants showed a positive attitude toward BLS training. An optimistic decision should be considered on the inclusion of Basic Life Support procedures in the university curriculum.

Three years' experience of dialysis event surveillance.

BACKGROUND: The main study aim was to track infections, evaluate performance, and identify opportunities for improved practice since infections, especially those associated with multidrug-resistant organisms, are the second most common cause of death among end-stage renal disease patients. METHODS: This study describes the establishment of baseline dialysis event surveillance at a large dialysis center. Every month, the dialysis center staff reported the total number of maintenance hemodialysis patients to the department of infection control and hospital epidemiology. The surveillance system for dialysis events included monthly monitoring of hemodialysis patients in outpatient settings for positive blood cultures, intravenous antimicrobial initiation, and local vascular access infections. RESULTS: We calculated the pooled mean rates of positive blood cultures, intravenous antimicrobial initiation, and local vascular access infections during the period from June 1, 2014 to September 30, 2017. Results indicated more dialysis events were attributed to the CVC than any other dialysis vascular access. Regardless of vascular access type, intravenous antimicrobial initiation was the most commonly reported dialysis-associated event. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis events surveillance can be used to produce a decrease in both morbidity and mortality rates in hemodialysis patients.